12-0908 Susan Rae Berkovitz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent.
Hennepin County.
The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion when it summarily denied the appellant’s second petition for postconviction relief because the petition was filed after the two-year limitations period in Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(a) (2012) had expired, and neither the newly discovered evidence nor the interests of justice exceptions to the limitations period apply.
Affirmed. Justice David R. Stras.
- news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/.../29_hughesa_securi...Cached - SimilarShareSep 29, 2004 – You could not read in his eyes that a year ago Susan Berkovitz fired an antique pistol at him from inches away, painfully ripping through his ...Shared on Google+. View the post.
Images for susan berkovitz
- Report imagesSusan " Berkovitz" Shoots Attorney in CourtRoom - Stormfront
6 posts - 6 authors - Sep 30, 2003Oct 1 2003 Victim For a month, Susan Berkovitz had waited for the hearing to reconsider a denial for a restraining order. After bitterly fighting.Get more discussion results
SHAME ON MINNESOTA COURTS AND JUSTICE DAVID R.STRAS et al
www.lawlessamerica.com lawlessamerica Affiant Sharon Anderson humble Plea to Hon.Bill Windsor re:Judicial Corruption,DenialDueProcess re: MN Victims,Whistleblowers
http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/deadbydiabetes2/
Brody
Credits:
Family photo/Star T
Brody the dog is put down after 2-year legal battle in Minnesota ...
articles.latimes.com/.../la-na-nn-minnesota-dog-put-d...CachedShare
Shared on Google+. View the post.
Dec 22, 2012 – Brody the dog is put down after 2-year legal battle in Minnesota ... The Minnesota Supreme Court had ruled this week that Lino Lakes could ... He called the retriever-Rottweiler mix a lovable, peaceful dog that had been ... Minnesota dog faces death sentence after state high court ruling ...
articles.latimes.com/.../la-na-nn-minnesota-dog-bite-20121220CachedShareDec 20, 2012 – Brody the dog may have reached the end of his days. ... city planned to put the dog down Friday, but that he was pleading for an alternative. ... The names of those bitten were identified in court documents only by their initials: ...
Shared on Google+. View the post.Minnesota dog destroyed after two year fight to save his life ...
www.examiner.com/.../minnesota-dog-destroyed-after-two-ye...CachedShareDec 23, 2012 – Brody's owner fought for years to save his dog's life, but that battle is now ... a ruling by the Minnesota Supreme Court which allowed Lino Lakes, Minn. ... “
Shared on Google+. View the post.Nobody likes to see a dog put down, but in reality the dog's owners had ... Mistrial called after victim's glass eyes falls out in court. t.co/dsQ8kxJQ #yikes ...
-
Supreme Court Opinions
-
www.mncourts.gov › Home › Appellate Courts › Supreme CourtCached - Similar
-
Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. A12-0908 Susan Rae Berkovitz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota ... period apply. Affirmed. Justice David R. Stras.
- Leslie Davis how do I transpose your Wall of Shame of Judges
-
Susan Berkovitz Defense Fund - CONTRIBUTE TODAY!
-
www.angelfire.com/mn3/deadbydiabetes/berkdefensefund.htmlCached
-
Susan Berkovitz Defense Fund. www.MurderbyDiabetes.org ... y. D. I. A. B. E. T. E
. S. SUSAN BERKOVITZ & HENDRICKSON. Also see: DDAweb.org · Google ...
From: notifications@justia.info
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 2/15/2013 8:06:13 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Minnesota Supreme Court Summaries for February 15, 2013
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.
Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.com
Practice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.Today on Verdict
Protecting Social Security From an Onslaught of Misinformation: Young People Need to Make Sure That This Essential Program Will Be There to Help Them
Justia columnist, George Washington law professor, and economist Neil Buchanan cautions young people that there is much misinformation in the media, and from some in Congress, now about Social Security, which he urges them to resist. Read ArticleDaily Opinion Summaries
Minnesota Supreme Court
- Green v. BMW of N. Am., LLC
Consumer Law, Contracts- Berkovitz v. State
Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law
Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia Green v. BMW of N. Am., LLC
Docket: A11-581 Opinion Date: February 13, 2013 Judge: Gildea Areas of Law: Consumer Law, Contracts Plaintiff leased a vehicle from BMW. Plaintiff claimed the leased vehicle was defective and brought suit against BMW. After a bench trial, the trial court awarded Plaintiff $25,157 in damages based on Minnesota's lemon law. The district court then granted Plaintiff's motion for an award of attorney fees and litigation costs, awarding Plaintiff a total of $229,064 in fees and costs. In reaching its conclusion on attorney fees, the court determined that it was "improper to compare the amount of reasonable legal fees to the amount of recovery in determining the proper fee award." The court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court reversed, holding (1) the amount involved in the litigation and the results obtained are relevant factors that the district court is to consider in awarding attorney fees under Minnesota's lemon law; and (2) the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider these factors in awarding attorney fees under the lemon law. Remanded.
http://j.st/LeD 
View Case On: Justia Google Scholar Berkovitz v. State
Docket: A12-908 Opinion Date: February 13, 2013 Judge: Stras Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law After a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and attempted first-degree murder. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's convictions on direct appeal. Defendant filed a petition for habeas corpus relief in federal district court, which was denied, and a petition for postconviction relief in state court, which was also denied. Defendant subsequently filed a second petition for postconviction relief, which the postconviction court denied after concluding that the petition was filed after the expiration of the two-year limitations period in Minn. Stat. 590.01, subd. 4(a)(2). The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition as untimely, as the petition satisfied neither exception to the limitations period.
http://j.st/Lea View Case On: Justia Google Scholar
Forward to a Friend
Have friends who like law? Forward this email.
